State and Oppression: Paradox of Heirarchy

Governmantal policy is often contradictory in that its aims and outcomes often differ. This discrepancy is often the result of competing objectives around which sub-system of government can best facilitate the interest of the state. Interest of state varies according to amount of resources infused into the particular sub-system of government. One example is the financial system which controls every aspect of society which ensures the ultimate conclusion involving dispute is resolved by the financial system. Is this inherently wrong? If so, accounting to whom?